It took almost a
year for D.W. Griffith's silent movie classic The Birth of a Nation
to reach Vancouver. But finally the Avenue Theatre on Main Street
obtained it for a three-week run, starting Christmas Day, 1915, and
running to Jan.15,1916.
The hype was
incredible. “Eighth Wonder of the World,” trumpeted the opening
ad. “The Greatest Art Conquest Since the Beginning of
Civilization!”
The Avenue could
run ads like this without shame, because Griffith had put together a
startling, innovative film.
At three hours
long, Birth of a Nation was one of the first feature-length films -
previously, most movies were about half an hour, or less. According
to the History.com website, Griffith also came up
with many
innovations that became standard film making techniques: “The
close-up, the scenic long shot, the moving-camera shot, and the
fade-in and fade-out.”
The Vancouver World
thought Griffith brought film into the realm of art.
“It
has been charged against the screen that it can never be a truly
artistic medium, because it leaves nothing to the imagination,”
said the World. “In
order to overcome the absence of speech it must go into every minute
detail, and exaggerate every slightest gesture beyond its true
proportion.”
“The
criticism has been just as a criticism of fact against about
nine-tenths of the film drama to date. But as a prediction it has
been destroyed by Mr. D.W. Griffith, the master artist who directed
'The Birth of a Nation.'”
Griffith's mastery
of film technique failed to quiet critics who said the film was
racist.
Birth of a Nation
was based on the play The Clansman by Thomas Dixon, which depicted
the rise of the Ku Klux Klan after the U.S. Civil War. In fact, the
movie itself was originally titled The Clansman.
Today, many people
think of the Ku Klux Klan as white thugs in white hoods who
terrorized and 'killed black people' in the Deep South. But in
Dixon's story, it was a group of courageous patriots who rose up to
fight white carpetbaggers (businessmen) from the North and their
black allies in the South who oppressed white men and raped their
women.
Defenders of Birth
of a Nation argued it was a "historic portrayal" of
southern life after the
Civil War.
But critics like
James W. Johnson of the “coloured” newspaper The New York Age
thought it was “perverted history!”
“The majority of
the incidents portrayed in Dixon's play that relate to coloured
people never happened,” Johnson wrote.
“When did any
Negro lieutenant-governor of a Southern state ever try by force to
make a white woman marry him?
When did Negro
troops, led by Northern officers, ever loot and pillage the homes of
the Southern whites and maltreat and murder the occupants of these
homes?"
The movie stirred
up controversy wherever it went, and was banned in some states (Ohio,
Minnesota) and cities (Tacoma, Memphis, Ottawa). In Vancouver, the
Negro Christian Alliances sent a protest letter to council arguing
the film was “offensive to all the coloured people throughout the
earth,” and bred “race antagonism.”
“Canada does not
desire to see her citizens lynched, shot and burned by low-browed,
half-witted individuals defying all law and order,” said the
protest letter, which was printed in the World.
“Yet this
shameful outrage will become a matter of history in Canadian'
national life if the picture-play called The Birth of a Nation is
allowed to be exhibited throughout Britain's most promising overseas
dominion.”
But the movie went
ahead as scheduled. After the initial controversy, the World chose to
focus on the epic elements of the film.
“Five thousand
scenes, 18,000 characters, 3,000 horses, approximate cost of
production S500,000,” the World noted. "Cities built up, then
destroyed by fire. The biggest battle of the Civil War reenacted.
Ford's Theatre, Washington, reproduced to the smallest detail for the
Lincoln tragedy. A series of wild 'Klu-Klux' rides that commandeered
a county for a day and cost $10,000. Wonderful artillery duels in
which real shells -- costing $80 a Piece -- were used. Miles of
trenches, thousands of fighters --'War as it actually is.'”
The latter
statement seems in poor taste, given that men were being slaughtered
at the time.
During the First
World War. Still, The Birth of a Nation was a huge hit, and cemented
Griffith's reputation as a movie legend.
From
the JOHN MACKIE article in the 9 January 2016 issue of the Vancouver
Sun.
No comments:
Post a Comment